|
e-Consulting by CARBOTEX |
Comments on Other's Voices incl. Published Items.
Last Updated: 25th April 2000
(see also
Our Last Messages, at the Start Menu)A very interesting content on a subject apparently out of consideration, but with a very real actuality. In the actual time, it seams that cotton "can only be dyed with reactiv dyes". A lot of dye houses I am normally involved, have used ONLY reactiv dyes in the past. The dyeing culture for other dyes on cotton has been complete lost. I was very well impressed from the fact that this subject has been presented by people in charge of industrial dye houses, with practical experience and facing every day the requirements of the market.
In the dye houses where they have "re-invented" the cotton dyeing with direct dyes for pale and medium shades, it was absolutelly necessary to intorduce a very different way of thinking and looking in which cases direct dyes can be from interes and which kind of direct dyes. The fact has been again:
Our strategy "the lot has to be level from the beginning" using controlled adsorption is the real answer to this problem. Salt sensitivity has to be understood as: excellent control of the rate of exhaustion using electrolite.
Additionally to the presentation in the mentioned paper, the CARBOTEX software for evaluation of exhaustion curves and prediction of production parameters is used very succesfully this concern. The complementary support is the lab methods used as basis allowing a correct evaluation.
Independing of the very objective description of the real news in the ITMA, I would like to recommend to read with big attention and to try to deduct all the consequences of his statement on the page 80, under "A glimpse of the future". Some of you know my asestment "It is not enough to buy the best Stradivarius, it is absolutelly necessary also to learn to play the violon". In the decription of Prof. Hilden: he os now speaking about the neead to form and educate excellent "orchester-conductors"… I can agree!
Controlling the "offer" for a given "demand", insteat of controlling the "demand" for enough big "offers". A big confussion trying to tell things different avoiding to accept concepts very well introduced in the industrial production. It could be called: "A 'me too' product".
The titel don't corresponds to the content, because in can not be called "dyeing" a staining of wool with "water non-soluble, CO2-soluble Dyes" I will like to propose to call it: "Anschmützen aus….". Every body involved in the dyeing von Wool/PES Blends know very well that the "water unsoluble dyes (a good example are disperse dyes) stain the wool in a very different color as on PES and don't present any acceptable fastness". It is also well known, that some kind of lether could also be dyed with these class of dyes, with all the corresponding precautions and limits. We will wait till the money invest in this project can be returned in the sense of "profitable investiment for research purposes".
The more valid sentence in this publication: "For this method, only CO2-soluble dyes can be used".
Very interesting the way to chack during a dyeing the quantity of exhausted dye and specially of hydrolized dye. It would be very interesting to become more information about the improvements achieved using this strategy concerning reproducibility of shades from lab to production, from lot to lot in the production. Influence of the liquor ratio if the load of a given machine changes according to the markat requirements?
Splendid theoretical work, where the biggest question is: how we know the profile to be used in any practical case? Which is the influence of the dye compatibility in the choice of the most interesting profile? Remain the profiles constant and independant of the additional dyes and auxiliaries in the recipe? Why the profile has to be related to a given dyeing machine (the profile is a function of time and, consequently, not usefull for any dyeing machine).
How can be published something like that in year 2000? It remembers the "magic recommendations" of the old patten cards, with some additions (Made by Dr. Hoffmann ?) related to the determination of fiber affinity, direct deduced from the very well know recommendations (also from Dyestar, formals Bayer) for Polyesther Fibers. Poor, complicated and no mention at all of the magnific possibilities from the progressive dosing of acid (see also my Bibliography, together with Dr. Annen and Mr. Engeler,
TEXTIL-VEREDLUNG - VOL. 15, (1980) , Nr 8, pag. 296-302!). Dyestar has promoted in the last time processes based on dosing (ph-Programming) together with THIES. CIBA has promoted in the middel of seventies together with Polymetrom a similar device specially recommended for the dyeing of polyamide carpets. They have problems? We are working with THEN, COMEUREG, E.A.S. with very precise data concerning acid dosing during heating (going out from Teintolab trials) since a lot of years with Companies like DOGI, RÖKONA, etc. But Dyestar don't like to follow this way… and CIBA neither! Is it that a help to our european Textile-Industry?Nothing absolutely new, but very well presented and with practical recommendations. The comparation between continuous and bulk dyeing methods, specially concerning penetration of dyeing has to be repeated again and again. In some cases, other authors claim the higher yeld of the continuous dyeing: that is very often a sign of poor penetration!
Nothing absolutely new, Fong propose Dye-By-Contact. But they don’t have the knowledge necessary for the adoption of Contact-Based processes like the Paremetring Method by CATEX SoftWare. What they believe about dyeing by contact???
Nothing absolutely new, Longclose propose Dye-By-Contact. But they don’t have the knowledge necessary for the adoption of Contact-Based processes like the Paremetring Method by CATEX SoftWare. What they believe about dyeing by contact???
Nothing absolutely new, What about color reproducibility ? In the comment: "Disadvantage is that the dye exhaustion could be lower than the conventional two-steps dyeings"... One Batch means not yet economical production...
Textile Finishing has to remain in Europe, near to the market, but it is absolutelly necessary to ultimate and implement technologies and production strategies avoiding corrections. The Right-First-Time is a must!
One of the best publications in the last time. Very clear explained, with a lot of interesting bibliografy.
Another very practical publication in the last time. Interesting following points – to reflect on it!:
Wrongly passed - wrongly failed: A wrongly failed pass has detrimentral consequences:
- it is unnecessarily reprocessed
- Other quality parameters (hairiness, hand feel, etc.) are sacrified
- Reprocessed batches exhibit poor fastnesses and dimensional stability
- Delivery is delayed
- Supplier profit is reduced
- The supplyer/customer relation suffers
Subjects to be presented in the near future (in preparation):